The survey shows that trends in the EMEA life insurance market aren鈥檛 much different than the rest of the world 鈥 but for one interesting difference. As elsewhere, insurers in Europe experience slow product development and could benefit from greater product support and prioritisation. Read more.
The history of life insurance is almost too long to fit on one timeline, whereas various life insurance products have entered the fray in far more recent times.
Insurance originally began as a way for traders to reduce their risk, reportedly as early as 1750 B.C. in Babylon and 2000 B.C. in China. Life insurance dates back to circa 600 B.C., when ancient Greeks and Romans created groups called 鈥渂enevolent societies,鈥 which cared for the families of deceased members, and paid the members鈥 funeral expenses.
It wasn鈥檛 until the 1750s that the necessary mathematical and statistical tools were in place for the development of modern life insurance. The world鈥檚 first life insurance company was the Amicable Society for a Perpetual Assurance Office (aka the Amicable Society), which was founded in London in 1706 by William Talbot and Sir Thomas Allen.
This company鈥檚 first life insurance product was structured so that each member paid a fixed annual payment per share on one to three shares, with the eligible age range of the membership being 12 to 55. At the end of the year, a portion of the 鈥渁micable contribution鈥 was divided among the wives and children of deceased members, in proportion to the amount of shares the heirs owned. This first product had many imperfections by today鈥檚 standards, but it served as the basis of the life insurance products and policies that exist today.
Towards the end of the 17th century, modern life insurance really started to take off, with more than two dozen life insurance companies starting up between 1787 and 1837 in the U.S. alone. As part of this expansion, life insurance products also developed in terms of their features, a reflection of the increasingly competitive environment and the emergence of the life insurance market.
The current market drives insurers to work harder than ever before to remain competitive and profitable. More than ever, product development is becoming a key priority for the global insurance industry. Insurers that invest in new solutions and automate and streamline their product development processes will find themselves with greater sales volumes and more satisfied customers because of appropriate product fit.
Greater accuracy 鈥 characterised by risk dynamics associated with selection 鈥 across underwriting and pricing processes is essential. The consequences for insurers that neglect product innovation are dire: They will fail to deliver targeted products to producers and customers quickly and efficiently, and as a result will lose business, as well as market share.
RGA recently sought to assess and quantify these issues more closely by conducting our first global survey of life insurers. We surveyed more than 100 product development leaders in 12 countries across Europe, Asia and the Americas.
Overall, product development in life insurance across the globe continues to be negatively impacted by two major issues: the long lead times required to generate new product ideas and subsequently bringing these ideas to market, and a widespread dissatisfaction with the quality of innovation in the current crop of new product ideas.
The study also yielded a number of interesting insights:
The findings show that there are clear opportunities for insurers around the world to improve their product development process, enhance the innovation of their products, and shorten and strengthen the development cycle by:
How do these global results compare to the Australian market?
There are a number of notable differences in the market structure in Australia, with its heavy bank presence and the number of competing products such as those that are superannuation 鈥 and investment 鈥 based. Super Funds tend to receive the most priority and attention, which results in shorter product development times when compared to standalone life insurance.
Overall, however, the trend in the Australian life insurance market is similar to what is happening overseas 鈥 namely that new products progress at a relatively slow pace from development to release. It is clear that work is needed in product support and prioritisation, and, most of all, more focus must be placed on the end customers and what they want.
How do these global results compare to the European markets?
The survey shows that trends in the EMEA life insurance market aren鈥檛 much different than the rest of the world 鈥 but for one interesting difference. As elsewhere, insurers in Europe experience slow product development and could benefit from greater product support and prioritisation. EMEA respondents, however, are on average faster in developing new products from idea to launch, yet the number of new products introduced in the market is lower when compared with the Asia Pacific region.
EMEA markets also appear to have recognized that innovation comes from customer focus, and are more likely to use market surveys to understand what customers may want or need 鈥 a strategy that is still uncommon elsewhere. This is more important than ever because, while classic customer sales points are still key in selling insurances, today鈥檚 consumers have more external influencers, such as social media and comparison sites with product reviews, all of them available via mobile technology. Whether you are fast to the market or slow to the market with a new product doesn鈥檛 really matter if it鈥檚 the wrong product.
漏&苍产蝉辫;2015, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without the prior permission of the publisher.
RGA has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that the information provided in this publication is accurate at the time of inclusion and accepts no liability for any inaccuracies or omissions.
